Community Set Up And Dating Is Not Exemptedâ€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Community Set Up And Dating Is Not Exempted? Answer: Introduction Embracing of technology has brought about new ways of how people interact, converse and connect in a community set up and dating is not exempted. The predominance ofsmart phones allude that we are always in contact and social media has made it possible to know a lot of people even before they met. Dating sites and applications give people a lot of choices to choose a potential partner. But we do ask ourselves if switching to this new way of socializing right or wrong, moral or immoral. Such question will be answered by theories outlined below. Utilitarianism Theory This theory focuses on standardization of the outcomes of selecting an action over others to be either wrong or right. It extends beyond the confinement of personal interests and considers the interests of others.(Stichler, Hauptman, 2009). This theory is based on several principles: Bentham's Principle of Utility: focuses on identification of crucial duties of pain and pleasure in the life of a human being, accepts or condemns and action on the grounds of pleasure and pain achieved, assimilates pain with evil and pleasure with good and states that pain and pleasure can be quantified thus measurable. In the case study, we try to understand how much pain or pleasure does technology brings into dating. However, John Stuart Millargues that it is not about quantification of pain and pleasure but that of quality of happiness that is key in utilitarian theory. Act-utilitarianism principle of utility directly applies to every selected option applied in a situation. It defines a right action as that which gives the best outcome. Criticisms of this view point is that be immoral acts can be justified. In this scenario we try to understand if bringing too much technology to dating bring about the best results. (Reynolds, 2013). Rule-utilitarianism principle of utility is used to decide the genuineness of moral principles. Thus the virtue of an action being right or wrong depends solely on whether one is adhering to the set principles. A general criticism of this principle is that unfair rule can be developed. Internet has brought in the ability to stalk the person of interest either on facebook, and other social sites. According to moral principles this act is wrong. Information gained on the internet about a person may not be accurate as the information you get when you meet the individual face to face. Deontology Theory Deontological or duty-based theory is centred upon about what humans don and not the outcomes of their activities. This theory depends on the nonconsequentialist aspect of individuals and decorous decision making. Therefore, this theory stands on the basis that a certain behaviour is not justifiable by its results or outcomes instead other aspects than just acceptable results decides whether that action is right. With this theory means are crucial in cases where the ends justify the means. (Floridi,2013). Deontologists consider the following as moral rules; its wrong to steal, lie, kill innocent people and right to keep promises. Individuals who adhere to this theory should always consider themselves to do the right thing even if it causes more harm than good. The baseline here is just doing the right thing and not worry about the consequences. In our case study, we try to use this theory to understand if people use technology to do the right thing, that is, will they want the same to be done to them. Like installing spy software on spouses phone or laptop to see what he/ she is doing. According to this theory that is wrong. (Jasanoff, 2016). Criticism of this view is that Duty-based ethics is that it can lead to continuity of activities that can consequently reduce the degree of pleasure because it is not based on the consequences. Virtue Theory This theory gives priority to the character of a person as the crucial feature of moral thinking, instead of principles about the actions or their outcome. There arethree main strandsof this theory: Eudaimonism- is thesymmetrical conception of Virtue Ethics. It argues that good life and happiness is the major objective of any person and this objective can be met by applying right virtues to our daily undertakings and practicing wisdom to counter conflicts that may come our way. Actually a good life would be made up of eudaimonia which should be considered as a goal from a life well lived without regarding the emotional state of an individual experiencing it. (Kidd Chen, 2008). Avirtueis apracticethat enables a person achieve their goals. The primary concern of virtue ethicsis the character traits of an individual that are crucial for the flourishment of a person not with the list of duties. This theory gives directions one behaviours and characteristics a moral individual seek to attain. It is more interested in the life of a human being than some specific actions. It is an important theory because people tend to criticize the behaviours and characters of another individual than evaluating the consequences of an action. This implies that it is better to teach people how to be good than using laws and punishments to stop wrong actions from being done is a society. To be of use, a virtue theory should enumerate a least set of features and behaviour an individual should have in order to be considered virtuous. Virtue ethics educates that an action is taken to be right if it can be done by a good person under the same environment. This theory suggests that if a virtuous person uses technology to find a spouse and s/he can use it again and again then that act is considered right. Arguably, it is not true because you dont know the persons character and traits thus what you talk over the internet may not be seen if you meet in person. (Taddeo Miller, 2016). This theory has been criticized that as much is it give directions on how to be a good person it doesnt give clear guidance on moral; dilemmas. It is more likely to take a virtuous person as a role model because he/ she would know what to do and how to do it. Contract Theory This theory takes morals and political responsibilities of a person as relying on convention between them to develop a community in which they reside. However, this theory is justifiably affiliated to contemporary political and moral theory. In the modern West, it has been one of the primary theories within political and moral throughout its history. (Beycioglu, 2013). Contract theory examines the traits of a decision maker using defined set of structures. Its goal is to enter procedures that will improve a persons decision. Due to this, contract theory has been broken down into three types of foundations:adverse selection, moral hazard, and signalling. These frameworks develop ways for groups to utilize suitable actions These models find ways for parties to take appropriate actions under certain conditions established in the contract. However, this theory has been criticized that it depicts a deficient image of political and moral live of people and may disguise some of the techniques in which the contract is submissive upon subjection of peoples classes. (Schultz, 2010). Conclusion The assumption and the idea that online dating save on time has been taken to be more important that actually looking for a partner. Online dating has several advantages including giving a person several potential partners of different personalities than they would actually find on daily basis. However, finding and choosing a partner who is a perfect match can be confusing and difficult and some of the important qualities cannot be identified as one could have identified them one on one. Recommendation As much as we live in a world where technology has taken the centre stage, dating is not just a life choice, but forms basis of good families, therefore, I do recommend that people interact physically with the people they would like to share the rest of their lives with. This gives them opportunity to know their individual characters and traits before they opt to settle down and start a family together. References Beycioglu, K. (2013).Ethical technology use, policy, and reactions in educational settings. Hershey, Pa: Information Science Reference. Floridi, L. (2013).The ethics of information. Jasanoff, S. (2016).The ethics of invention: Technology and the human future. Johnson, D. G., Miller, K. (2009).Computer ethics: Analyzing information technology. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall. Kidd, T. T., Chen, I. (2008).Social information technology: Connecting society and cultural issues. Hershey: Information Science Reference. Reynolds, G. W. (2013).Principles of ethics in information technology. Schultz, R. A. (2010).Information technology and the ethics of globalization: Transnational issues and implications. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. Stichler, R. N., Hauptman, R. (2009).Ethics, information and technology: Readings. Jefferson, NC: McFarland. Taddeo, M., Miller, K. W. (2016).The ethics of information technologies. Aldershot, Hamps: Ashgate Publishing. Tavani, H. T. (2011).Ethics and technology: Controversies, questions, and strategies for ethical computing. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.